A Lagos High Court Judge, Justice Olusola Williams on Monday sentenced the former Chairman of National Drug Law Enforcement Agency [NDLEA] Bello Lafiaji to sixteen years imprisonment while his Personal Assistant, Usman Amali bagged 7 years imprisonment having been found guilty of using their offices to confer corrupt advantage upon themselves.
Delivering judgment in the two-year-old suit, Justice Williams held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt adding that the accused are guilty of conspiracy and abuse of their offices.
The court convicted Lafiaji on counts 1, 2,3,4,6 and 7 while Amali was convicted on counts 1,2,3,4 and 5 respectively; however, the sentences are to run concurrently.
The court held that Lafiaji conspired with his personal Assistant and illegally received 164,300 euro from one Ikenna Onochie, a suspect with the NDLEA in order to release him and his vehicles from custody.
"The action of the defendants to carry out their unlawful action is not in doubt. There was an agreement between them to do what they did. The prosecution has proved that the release of Ikenna Onochie was irregular", the court held while the court acknowledged that the former NDLEA boss did all he could to elevate the standards of the Agency he however allowed the love of money to tarnish his hard-earned reputation.
In addition, Justice Williams observed that Usman Amali, [second defendant] also followed the biddings of his master [Lafiaji] blindly.
The court held that the testimony of Samuel Gadzama [PW1] was credible and acceptable adding that his testimony did not change and did not contradict himself under cross examination.
Gadzama, who is head of NDLEA Special Investigation Unit (but is now under suspension), had during his testimony told the court that Lafiaji instructed him to release Onochie and his confiscated property the same day he was arrested.
He also testified that Lafiaji also instructed him not to document the arrest and seizure on the ground that the suspect was a friend of the NDLEA.
Lafiaji, was removed as the NDLEA boss in 2005, and had pleaded not guilty to the seven-count charge of conspiracy and abuse of office leveled against him and his Personal Assistant Usman Amali.
They were also said to have conspired to use their offices to confer corrupt advantage upon themselves, contrary to Sections 26 and 19 of the ICPC Act, 2000.
The ICPC had in its amended charge alleged that the accused had in November 2005 conspired to unlawfully receive 164,300 euro from one Ikenna Onochie, a suspect with the NDLEA, being exhibit seized from the suspect in order to release him and his vehicles from custody.
They were also said to have conspired to use their offices to confer corrupt advantage upon themselves, contrary to Sections 26 and 19 of the ICPC Act, 2000.
During the proceedings, prosecuting counsel, Bolaji Ayorinde SAN in his submissions, described the suit as a classical case of corruption and manipulation of the system by the accused persons.
Ayorinde further submitted that the facts of the case pointed to only one conclusion, which is the guilt of the accused persons. But, the defence lawyer, Professor Taiwo Oshipitan [SAN], while adopting his written address, urged the court to discharge and acquit the two accuse persons for lack of evidence adding that the prosecution built its case on mere suspicion.
Oshipitan submitted that the charges levelled against his clients were destined to fail from inception arguing that there are variations between the charges and testimonies of witnesses that came to testify in court.
He pointed out that while the prosecution alleged that 164, 300 euro was received from Ikenna Onochie, in order to release him and his vehicles from custody, but the statement of Onochie revealed that 168,400 euro was actually recovered from his house.
He submitted that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove every word contain in the charge and not to create doubt in the mind of the court.


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks